What is upper management’s role in Six Sigma implementation – and how can they improve a project’s chance of success? Read this informative article to find out.
Some of the main benefits associated with Six Sigma
implementations in business organizations include increased profitability,
reduced operational costs, and increased customer satisfaction. The nature of
derived benefits may vary but the main criterion applied during Six Sigma
implementations is that the end result should be in accordance with the aims
and objectives of the upper management.
This is necessary because the upper management is
entrusted with the task of the overall growth of the organization and if
results do not match upper management requirements, it could hamper the growth
of the organization. It could also lead to a situation wherein the organization
loses sight of its original aims and objectives.
Necessity of Upper Management Involvement
Upper management is often busy with other important tasks
and may not have the time or resources for getting actively involved in Six
Sigma implementations. Sometimes the lack of commitment may also arise due the
general perception of the upper management that Six Sigma is related to work
processes, which is the job of operational managers. It is true that most Six
Sigma concepts are implemented at the process level but it does not mean that
involvement of the upper management is not required. Upper management support
is necessary because the full scope of Six Sigma implementations is not limited
to process improvements and stretches far beyond, transcending functional
departments to expose the need for changes in the organizational structure.
This would be quite impossible to achieve until and unless
the upper management strongly and actively supports the initiatives undertaken
by the Six Sigma implementation team. For garnering support from the upper
management, the quality department can make a presentation about the COPQ (cost
of poor quality) of the organization. With the help of COPQ, the upper
management will be able to understand the full implications of poor quality,
which may include increased production costs and growing customer
dissatisfaction.
Things
to be done
Six Sigma projects are most successful when they are
implemented from the ground up, i.e. they cover all aspects of a business
process. This very often requires Black Belts to make major changes in the
existing process, which is only possible after getting the requisite permission
from the upper management. Sometimes the upper management may intentionally
deny giving the permission, fearing that in case something goes wrong, the
blame will be entirely put on the upper management.
However, the chances of anything going wrong are minimal
because with continuous support, guidance, and encouragement, the Six Sigma
team members are bound to succeed in their initiatives. Statistics also reveal
that organizations that provided upper management support had a much better
rate of successful Six Sigma implementations. The success of any Six Sigma
initiative depends on the resources that are made available to Six Sigma team
members.
Of all the resources, the most important is the monitory
support, which needs to be extended by the upper management all throughout the
implementation stage. In some implementations, the upper management may also be
required to provide managerial support to Six Sigma teams. The project
implementation can continue even in the absence of managerial and financial
support, but this is not advisable, as it will unnecessarily lead to the
extension of the project implementation deadline.
Upper management needs to understand that Six Sigma
projects have widespread and far-reaching implications and that they can be
utilized for achieving existing goals and objectives. The upper management also
needs to understand that all they need to do is to provide the necessary
support; they do not have to actually inspect every improvement that is being
made. Only then, Six Sigma implementations will be able to bring about
considerable and long lasting changes in the organization.