Six Sigma methodology is not a
self-sustaining management tool perhaps unlike other technologies. It can only deliver the results subject to
multiple variables and inputs such as deployment intensity and culture. Nonetheless,
the results take around 4-6 months to show, depending on the projects selected
and adherence to the tenets of the methodology.
The Six Sigma audit process does
not depart too much from the assessment process of the deployment, in order
that implementation status is checked for its effectiveness. The audit
procedure dwells on questionnaires and checklists which help auditors evaluate
the status of respective processes on ‘as is’ condition which is later compared
with ‘should be’ condition. The ‘should be’ condition is the reference standard
clearly defined at the beginning of the deployment in the goal setting stage.
The audit process in Six Sigma
is pretty much comparable with a ISO 9000 audit. Many Six Sigma companies have
successfully developed Six Sigma audit procedures based on the ISO 9000
principles but goes a bit further in the sense that Six Sigma takes into
consideration the Voice of Customer (VOC). However, while auditing customers it
is the internal customers that are interviewed. Using of audit procedures
developed by Malcolm Baldrige Quality Awards is not new and unique in Six Sigma
audit.
Use of Checklists and Charts for Six Sigma Audit
Using charts, made in the form
of checklists, in audit ensures that nothing is left to chance. A checklist,
which is exhaustive, is prepared during the launch of the project. There will
be multiple checklists for each process and activity which can be used
methodically to assess the processes involved in the project. For example, to
check the leadership level and knowledge levels of Black Belts you can use the
appropriate list.
The process audit checklists,
like the rest, are prepared based on the Standard Operating Procedure defined
in the beginning. Each question critically examines as to whether a step is
being followed and if yes, how well. The activities and sub activities, since
they are measurable, can be rated on the fact sheet on a predetermined scale.
The answers to these questionnaires are summarized on the sheet itself.
For example, take the case of a
dispatch system. If the process variation had occurred, the deviation is
recorded in the operator’s log which gets exposed during the audit. The
variations are plotted against the standard deviation for exact picture.
The deviations from the mean
represent process variation and with the help of these data, root causes of
process variations are interpreted.
The Scope of the Six Sigma Audit
All in all, the scope of the
audit is only limited by the preset goals and the customer reactions to the
changes. The measurable aspects, including the customer satisfaction level are
recognized independently and critically examined, which throws light on the
current status of that process. The correlation that exists between all
processes put together gives the final picture of where the project is heading
with respect to ROI and customer satisfaction.