Six Sigma Bottlenecks
One major bottleneck in Six
Sigma deployment can be attributed to errors in decision making which
invariably leads to higher COPQ. The bottlenecks are critically different for
small and companies from large corporations because of their contextual
differences. Further, they may result from any or all phases of the deployment
process.
Bottlenecks In Low Cost Deployments: Often, small and medium
sized companies take to Six Sigma circles with limited resources and as a
consequence, expose themselves to additional limitations.
· Owing to
resource limitations, human and financial, more personnel are often found
working overtime
· Difficulty
in hiring the Belts on a full-time basis due to reasons other than financial;
for example, uncertainties including the commitment to deployment
· Question
of survival of the business owing to lack of innovativeness in product or
service development and introduction to the market
· Procrastinating
over decision-making on capital expenditures even against justified ROI
projections
The above roadblocks result in
problems such as:
· Non-availability
of methods and tools required for efficient and timely Six Sigma deployment
· Risk of
generating outdated, irrelevant and incompetent solutions for re/design and
development of product or service
· Prolongation
of project cycle time
· Expensive
errors at the early stages triggering a series of multiple errors
Overview of Bottlenecks Arising From Deployment Phases
Poor selection of projects is
often found to be the biggest stumbling block. Let’s take a critical look at
this:
Define Phase
- Lack of options for potential changes or
innovation
- Underestimation of subsequent secondary
problems
- Lack of failure analysis
- Unclear definition of alternative causes and
effects
- Failures due to wrong direction and narrowing
of scope
Measure Phase
- Variability of measurement or lack of
measurement systems
- Time lost in data collection
Improvement or Design Phase
- Shortcomings in innovative design improvement
ideas
- Unjustified consumption of DOE by labor and
time
Control or Verification Phase
Failure to simulate design and
prototype against the ‘voice of customer’ resulting in poor and non-exhaustive
failure projections and profiles can be mostly expected in this phase.
What immediately gets affected
by the bottlenecks are not just time losses but a newfound increase of COPQ.
Other pitfalls include repetitive idea and data collection, never-ending
discussions and meetings and examining alternatives that significantly hamper
the outcome. All of these factors
sometimes push the Six Sigma methodology to the threat of losing support for
future deployment plans. Error removal, even if not routine, must be practiced
inherently.