Search


  Advanced Search
 
Popular Authors
  1. Six Sigma Training Assistant
No popular authors found.
 
 »  Home  »  Six Sigma Implementation  »  How To Recognize Bottlenecks In Six Sigma Implementation
How To Recognize Bottlenecks In Six Sigma Implementation
By Six Sigma Training Assistant | Published  05/24/2007 | Six Sigma Implementation | Unrated
How To Recognize Bottlenecks In Six Sigma Implementation

Six Sigma Bottlenecks

One major bottleneck in Six Sigma deployment can be attributed to errors in decision making which invariably leads to higher COPQ. The bottlenecks are critically different for small and companies from large corporations because of their contextual differences. Further, they may result from any or all phases of the deployment process.

 

Bottlenecks In Low Cost Deployments: Often, small and medium sized companies take to Six Sigma circles with limited resources and as a consequence, expose themselves to additional limitations.

·  Owing to resource limitations, human and financial, more personnel are often found working overtime

·  Difficulty in hiring the Belts on a full-time basis due to reasons other than financial; for example, uncertainties including the commitment to deployment

·  Question of survival of the business owing to lack of innovativeness in product or service development and introduction to the market

·  Procrastinating over decision-making on capital expenditures even against justified ROI projections

 

The above roadblocks result in problems such as:

·  Non-availability of methods and tools required for efficient and timely Six Sigma deployment

·  Risk of generating outdated, irrelevant and incompetent solutions for re/design and development of product or service

·  Prolongation of project cycle time

·  Expensive errors at the early stages triggering a series of multiple errors


Overview of Bottlenecks Arising From Deployment Phases

Poor selection of projects is often found to be the biggest stumbling block. Let’s take a critical look at this:


Define Phase

  • Lack of options for potential changes or innovation
  • Underestimation of subsequent secondary problems
  • Lack of failure analysis
  • Unclear definition of alternative causes and effects
  • Failures due to wrong direction and narrowing of scope


Measure Phase

  • Variability of measurement or lack of measurement systems
  • Time lost in data collection


Improvement or Design Phase

  • Shortcomings in innovative design improvement ideas
  • Unjustified consumption of DOE by labor and time


Control or Verification Phase

Failure to simulate design and prototype against the ‘voice of customer’ resulting in poor and non-exhaustive failure projections and profiles can be mostly expected in this phase.

What immediately gets affected by the bottlenecks are not just time losses but a newfound increase of COPQ. Other pitfalls include repetitive idea and data collection, never-ending discussions and meetings and examining alternatives that significantly hamper the outcome.  All of these factors sometimes push the Six Sigma methodology to the threat of losing support for future deployment plans. Error removal, even if not routine, must be practiced inherently.

 
Related Articles
Article Series
This article is part 2 of a 2 part series. Other articles in this series are shown below:
  1. Implementing Lean Six Sigma
  2. How To Recognize Bottlenecks In Six Sigma Implementation