An
Insight Into Six Sigma Implementation
Six Sigma requires the organization restructured
correctly from top to bottom. From Champions to Green Belts, people are hired
or insiders are trained for specific duties. Personnel at each level of the
organization have their assigned and well-defined jobs with varying degrees of
authorities and powers so that, apart from executing their routine job duties,
they are able to effectively solve problems. This is a sticky issue where
powers overlap within executive departments. Unfortunately, at times this
causes relationships to sour, however unintentionally. The actions of
champions, who are supposed to intervene, can be mistaken for intrusion in
cross-departmental matters such as this.
It is here that the success of Six Sigma requires
total commitment from upper management of organizations. If the tense
atmosphere is not remedied, Master Black Belts or Black Belts can get
frustrated and fail to concentrate. Further deterioration, whether because of
procrastination on the part of Champions or upper management, brings
professionals into the fear zone. Consequently, the Six Sigma implementation
suffers. The delay in its implementation adds to the already hefty financial
bills with results yet to be realized.
Obviously, this pushes upper management into a
corner with few options. With the commitment of upper management being
challenged, the vision that the organization had fails to gel with the larger
scheme of things.
Key To
Successful Implementation Of Six Sigma
More or less, it is slow implementation that throws
the Six Sigma vision into question. If the first among these is the
miscalculation about the different aspects which include the saving potential
and implementation timeframe, the intensity with which the implementation is
being made comes in a close second.
The
Anomaly Of Limited Savings: It is
agreed that Six Sigma implementation is a huge expense to organizations, but if
companies adopt stringent accounting practices to calculate savings, with
tightening of expenditure as may become appropriate, results can be expected to
turn around. The expenditures can be calculated just like capital expenditures,
and proper adjustments to future budgets must be made. Failing this, savings in
terms of money in such cases cannot be expected to be substantial.
The
Intensity Factor: If for any
reason, there are less stringent implementation methodologies and the process
is pushed through without proper training of professionals, you can expect the
results to be mediocre. Compromises give way to a slippery slope and ultimately
the failure of Six Sigma.